Go Back   The AK Files Forums > Rifle Forums > AK-47s

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-15-2017, 09:40 PM   #71
Extra Medium
Dis Member
 
AKaholic #: 188133
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Go away, I'm batin'
Posts: 994
Default

I'd do the standard strength replacement spring, just for peace of mind. Is it a 2 rivet or a 3 rivet model?
__________________
CAPTAIN CAVEMAAAN!!!
Extra Medium is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2017, 10:06 PM   #72
Maxxsmart
Member
 
Maxxsmart's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 193820
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxbob View Post
Wow, your too sensitive dude. Don't buy an Ar if you don't want to. Your loss
Not senstative at all, Iíve just seen your instigating comments before, and itís kind of old now. I have a few ARs, and theyíre great guns. Buying ARs because AKs have dried up, not a solution to me at all. Personally, I donít buy into the AK vs AR bit... They have their place, and both have their ups and downs. Like I said, I have no beef with you, but your comment looked like you were starting chit.

Carry on, buddy.
Maxxsmart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 07:35 AM   #73
FalseFlagOps
Member
 
AKaholic #: 194141
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 44
Default

Aside from furniture issues in quality and stock comb the NPAP should serve you well functionally and be GTG from what I've heard although got some dings from AKOU torture test (funny thing, I have about 9 AKs but have yet to get an NPAP myself, opted for the WASR 10 at that last decision point, may be on my next one if prices stay low). I think Atlantic owes me a Christmas card this year for funding their kids college fund! Second the encyclopedic info offered by Mishaco, he truly knows his business.
FalseFlagOps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 09:37 AM   #74
RockyTop1911
More AKs Please!
 
RockyTop1911's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 186184
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Trump USA
Posts: 2,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyhipockets View Post
Where the f is Aceshigh, he usually jumps in wherever he can to shit-talk Arsenal. Seems odd not to hear from the old bag-o-wind.
He's taking a break from the board to get some projects done on his house and other properties. I just PM'd him a few days ago.
__________________
"The Constitution is the guide which I never will abandon." George Washington "Runaway government threatens our economic survival, our most cherished institutions, and the very preservation of freedom itself." Ronald Reagan "It depends upon what the meaning of the word is, is." William Jefferson Clinton "I've now been in 57 states." Barack Hussein Obama
RockyTop1911 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 12:15 PM   #75
GuidoFL
Curio & Relic
Contributor
 
GuidoFL's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 171081
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida CSA
Posts: 2,008
Default

I cannot believe this N PAP thing has come back to haunt us. Rob Ski went out of his way to test these rifles TWICE ! And both times came back as fails. So do your research and find out for yourself OP ! JEEZ !
__________________
NRA Life/Endowment
GuidoFL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 11:38 PM   #76
Mattylight30
Curio & Relic
 
Mattylight30's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 172152
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 4,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manki77 View Post
Anyone know if NPAP is silencer friendly? As in concentric threads and able to handle the back pressure?
Shot a DF suppressed at the AK shootout, functioned fine but the gas did seep through the recoil buffer cut out and had some force hitting you in the eye.
Mattylight30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 01:27 AM   #77
mishaco
Veteran Member
 
AKaholic #: 190226
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,003
Default

I disagree. The NPAP did not fail Rob's 2nd 5k test, and the only part that really broke was the buttstock, which is a crap made US part from Century. They put the same stock on their current WASR10s too, so its reasonable to assume it would fail in a WASR 5k test too.


Not saying the NPAP is perfect, but at current prices, you get a very good rifle for the coin.
My NP-DF has been 100% for over a year now....hey for me personally, it has a better trackrecord than my Polytech Legend lol.
Only thing I recommend is to swap out the recoil spring, and eventually the buttstock (if fixed stock) too.
Then your rifle should be gtg.

At least, sure beats a RAS47 right?
And is much cheaper than any Arsenal, even the SLR-107R.
mishaco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 01:31 AM   #78
wormraper
Member
 
AKaholic #: 192990
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mishaco View Post
I disagree. The NPAP did not fail Rob's 2nd 5k test, and the only part that really broke was the buttstock, which is a crap made US part from Century. They put the same stock on their current WASR10s too, so its reasonable to assume it would fail in a WASR 5k test too.


Not saying the NPAP is perfect, but at current prices, you get a very good rifle for the coin.
My NP-DF has been 100% for over a year now....hey for me personally, it has a better trackrecord than my Polytech Legend lol.
Only thing I recommend is to swap out the recoil spring, and eventually the buttstock (if fixed stock) too.
Then your rifle should be gtg.

At least, sure beats a RAS47 right?
And is much cheaper than any Arsenal, even the SLR-107R.
it KIND of failed his last 5k round test. he cracked the receiver between the 4K and 5K round mark
wormraper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 02:01 AM   #79
Browning Hi Power
Senior Member
 
Browning Hi Power's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 191931
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mishaco View Post
I disagree. The NPAP did not fail Rob's 2nd 5k test
It failed horribly Misha. It had multiple cycling issues, the recoil spring retaining button fell out, and the receiver cracked.
Browning Hi Power is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 02:57 AM   #80
mishaco
Veteran Member
 
AKaholic #: 190226
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,003
Default

It was still working at the end of the test.
Which is more than others.
Rob did give it away to a viewer too, recommending they keep an eye on the rear trunnion area.

The crack was very small, and 'might' have never happened with a different recoil spring.
The spring loaded latch coming out isn't a failure since the part effectively does nothing. It is just left over from grenade launching funtimes. The rifle would work exactly the same without it. Rob reinstalled it with a rock if memory serves right?
As to multiple cycling failures, i recall a few but nothing catastrophic, and causes could have been a number of things.

This site seems in love with the OPAP, yet people continue to disregard the NPAP. I am sorry, but that is a double standard.
Remember people loved the NPAP a lot more before his first 5k test. I just feel that if you condemn one, you must at least question the other. I know people think the OPAP's 1.5mm receiver would keep it from having any cracks or other issues, but this is just a theory. It could absolutely be true or a 5k test could reveal the same shortcomings. Without one, we just don't know for sure.

Keep in mind I did say the NPAP wasn't perfect and have agreed that the recoil spring is a weak point that needs switching out.
I am not even defending a rifle because I own it...I don't have an NPAP M70, either personally or in the store.
I do ahve an OPAP and NP-DF, which are different models, though all 3 are very similar and all built from the same basic materials and at the same factory by the same workers.

At $600 and even $550, the NPAP is still a much better buy than the I.O. or RAS47....you'll never convince me otherwise.
Is it better than the WASR? nah not really but then again, i don't think its majorily worse. Afterall, some guys like that the NPAP has a blued finish, and some have reported better accuracy with them. Also has a heavier barrel and longer HGs, which again some folks like.

There aren't reports all over the net of NPAPs blowing up like there are of the RAS47, so when people ask for a good sub-$600 AK, I don't feel at all bad in pointing them towards the NPAP.
It'll serve them a lot longer than most US made AKs, and it won't become a health risk hehe.

This is all old news and has been said before, so sorry for repeating myself.
Just my opinion based on selling these for a few years and talking with customers and friends that have shot theirs a goodly bit.
mishaco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 03:52 AM   #81
Extra Medium
Dis Member
 
AKaholic #: 188133
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Go away, I'm batin'
Posts: 994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mishaco View Post
It was still working at the end of the test.
Which is more than others.
Rob did give it away to a viewer too, recommending they keep an eye on the rear trunnion area.

The crack was very small, and 'might' have never happened with a different recoil spring.
The spring loaded latch coming out isn't a failure since the part effectively does nothing. It is just left over from grenade launching funtimes. The rifle would work exactly the same without it. Rob reinstalled it with a rock if memory serves right?
As to multiple cycling failures, i recall a few but nothing catastrophic, and causes could have been a number of things.

This site seems in love with the OPAP, yet people continue to disregard the NPAP. I am sorry, but that is a double standard.
Remember people loved the NPAP a lot more before his first 5k test. I just feel that if you condemn one, you must at least question the other. I know people think the OPAP's 1.5mm receiver would keep it from having any cracks or other issues, but this is just a theory. It could absolutely be true or a 5k test could reveal the same shortcomings. Without one, we just don't know for sure.

Keep in mind I did say the NPAP wasn't perfect and have agreed that the recoil spring is a weak point that needs switching out.
I am not even defending a rifle because I own it...I don't have an NPAP M70, either personally or in the store.
I do ahve an OPAP and NP-DF, which are different models, though all 3 are very similar and all built from the same basic materials and at the same factory by the same workers.

At $600 and even $550, the NPAP is still a much better buy than the I.O. or RAS47....you'll never convince me otherwise.
Is it better than the WASR? nah not really but then again, i don't think its majorily worse. Afterall, some guys like that the NPAP has a blued finish, and some have reported better accuracy with them. Also has a heavier barrel and longer HGs, which again some folks like.

There aren't reports all over the net of NPAPs blowing up like there are of the RAS47, so when people ask for a good sub-$600 AK, I don't feel at all bad in pointing them towards the NPAP.
It'll serve them a lot longer than most US made AKs, and it won't become a health risk hehe.

This is all old news and has been said before, so sorry for repeating myself.
Just my opinion based on selling these for a few years and talking with customers and friends that have shot theirs a goodly bit.
Mish, you freakin voice of reason. I love the way you express yourself. Would have loved to have had you as a history teacher, Although Mr. Whalen was incredible and one of the few I actually remember from so long ago.

Anyway, guns.. yeah, ummm.. I've been thinking about picking up an older milled arsenal (SLR95) from my buddy but I just can't justify the $1k he is asking. It would come with a bunch of goodies like a real bulgy stock set, lower tang, and some mags as well as the uncomfortable plastic butthole stock he for some reason keeps on it even though he has bulgy wood (go figure?), but I just don't wanna spend the cash. I love oddball, non standard things which is what probably made the decision to go OPAP over WASR and AK over AR in the first place. I don't have a huge budget for toys but I've also been seriously considering the NPAP DF. I've also ogled the selection you have on GB but probably won't spend any more money on myself this year. I've been tempted but have been strong. Went as far as fondling an NPDF at Fleet Farm when visiting Minnesota, but didn't pull the trigger and have it shipped to my FFL here at home. I'd own a DF model, but probably not a fixed stock version as my OPAP would just outshine it in every way with it's surplus furniture and hefty feel. The standard NP would end up being a red headed stepchild.

Anyway, just saw you on here and wanted to say hi. Have a good night.

One question, do you have to listen to your own words when you get a reply or can you skip to the actual reply? I'll stop quoting you if it is a pain in the neck. Just wondering how tough it is to navigate the files with Steven Hawking reading it to you.
__________________
CAPTAIN CAVEMAAAN!!!
Extra Medium is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 10:17 AM   #82
manki77
New Member
 
AKaholic #: 192119
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Georgia
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Extra Medium View Post
I'd do the standard strength replacement spring, just for peace of mind. Is it a 2 rivet or a 3 rivet model?
Looks to be three rivet model
manki77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 10:19 AM   #83
ohlongarm
Senior Member
 
AKaholic #: 193447
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: richfield ohio
Posts: 619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mishaco View Post
I disagree. The NPAP did not fail Rob's 2nd 5k test, and the only part that really broke was the buttstock, which is a crap made US part from Century. They put the same stock on their current WASR10s too, so its reasonable to assume it would fail in a WASR 5k test too.


Not saying the NPAP is perfect, but at current prices, you get a very good rifle for the coin.
My NP-DF has been 100% for over a year now....hey for me personally, it has a better trackrecord than my Polytech Legend lol.
Only thing I recommend is to swap out the recoil spring, and eventually the buttstock (if fixed stock) too.
Then your rifle should be gtg.

At least, sure beats a RAS47 right?
And is much cheaper than any Arsenal, even the SLR-107R.
Never had a full stock npap,but have had several underfolders,still have two,my shooter just broke 3000 rds this weekend in a year,and one couldn't tell it from the unfired,barely. Not one failure ever,spot on in accuracy no flaws if a gun has any flaws in function it's the hell out of here quick.IMO no better rifle made by anyone at the price point it is.
ohlongarm is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 10:52 AM   #84
Browning Hi Power
Senior Member
 
Browning Hi Power's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 191931
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 846
Default

Misha, this quote is from Rob regarding the second NPAP test. Note that he says there were 40-50 malfunctions. He didnít record it all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Ski View Post
I was surprised by this too. You could see where this was going after first couple thousand rounds. But it looks like metal got beat up to the point where deformation stopped.
I would say that Rak1 trigger probably helped.
@Anti rotation pins - Well, I had zero problems with trigger group moving around, but I suspect that retention plate helped more...
@ malfunctions - I would say that it was easy around 40 to 50 malfunctions in total. Again, most popular one, for whatever reason, was failure to feed.
Browning Hi Power is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 11:06 AM   #85
wormraper
Member
 
AKaholic #: 192990
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Browning Hi Power View Post
Misha, this quote is from Rob regarding the second NPAP test. Note that he says there were 40-50 malfunctions. He didnít record it all.
just playing devil's advocate... he surmised in the comment sections of that same one that he thinks it was due to the under powered recoil spring which also probably led to the cracked receiver (at least in part). something a quick spring change from the beginning might mitigate
wormraper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 11:34 AM   #86
Browning Hi Power
Senior Member
 
Browning Hi Power's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 191931
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wormraper View Post
just playing devil's advocate... he surmised in the comment sections of that same one that he thinks it was due to the under powered recoil spring which also probably led to the cracked receiver (at least in part). something a quick spring change from the beginning might mitigate
Thatís a good point. Speaking about under power recoil springs, I took out the stock recoil springs from my WASR and Draco and one is significantly shorter than the other, I mixed them up so I donít know which. The springs that come on these guns are added by Century IMO and they are very weak. With slight pressure of a pinky I could move the bolt carriers back a bit.
Browning Hi Power is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 11:37 AM   #87
wormraper
Member
 
AKaholic #: 192990
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 464
Default

Yeah. Luckily springs are cheap. I have two new wasrs and as soon as I break them in a bit I'm replacing with Wolff standard power springs just for safety. $15 is solid peace of mind. However, like the npap. I think it's cugir that's doing them. Recently century sent us a list of what parts were u.s. and which were factory Romanian and the recoil spring wasnt installed by century
wormraper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 11:47 AM   #88
John A.
Veteran Member
 
John A.'s Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 178172
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: not CALIFORNIA
Posts: 1,020
Default

Here are the things that I have changed in my Npap.

1. Wolff extra power recoil spring
2. Replaced Tapco hammer to one from Arsenal (Bulgaria)
3. Shepherds hook replaced with a plate
John A. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 11:50 AM   #89
wormraper
Member
 
AKaholic #: 192990
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 464
Default

I wonder if the newer n-paps and df,s come with the rak-1 like the newer wasr
wormraper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 11:54 AM   #90
Browning Hi Power
Senior Member
 
Browning Hi Power's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 191931
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wormraper View Post
Yeah. Luckily springs are cheap. I have two new wasrs and as soon as I break them in a bit I'm replacing with Wolff standard power springs just for safety. $15 is solid peace of mind. However, like the npap. I think it's cugir that's doing them. Recently century sent us a list of what parts were u.s. and which were factory Romanian and the recoil spring wasnt installed by century
If you’re going to go with standard power you can get the springs from K-Var for much cheaper.

http://www.k-var.com/shop/AK-033.html

I saw that report too. I was surprised and I don’t know that I buy it. The recoil springs that came with my AIMS kit, SAR1 and 2, all look different than the current WASR and Draco spring.
Browning Hi Power is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 12:08 PM   #91
slapshut
MAG WHORE
 
slapshut's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 165205
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DIXIE
Posts: 2,577
Default

The hammer and trigger holes can be screwed up from the start. The pins can also go into the receiver. I do not like the pins going past flush with slight pressure. This has gotten better, but I still see slopped out holes and pins with a lot of push.
__________________
We shall drive a bullet into the forehead
Of the rotten fascist filth,
For the scum of humanity
We shall build a solid coffin!


The Sacred War
slapshut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 12:15 PM   #92
Mike47
Member
 
AKaholic #: 182024
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: California
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wormraper View Post
I wonder if the newer n-paps and df,s come with the rak-1 like the newer wasr
They do.
Mike47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 12:20 PM   #93
wormraper
Member
 
AKaholic #: 192990
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Browning Hi Power View Post
If you’re going to go with standard power you can get the springs from K-Var for much cheaper.

http://www.k-var.com/shop/AK-033.html

I saw that report too. I was surprised and I don’t know that I buy it. The recoil springs that came with my AIMS kit, SAR1 and 2, all look different than the current WASR and Draco spring.
Damn. That's a BIT cheaper. Might grab 2-3 for replacements and backups at that price. Only problem is that they want $15 just to ship one... when I can get an ALG or Wolff for $12-$15 SHIPPED already.... lol..

Dunno if it's true or not. Was just saying what they told us

Last edited by wormraper; 10-17-2017 at 12:25 PM.
wormraper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 12:25 PM   #94
Made in Austria
Member
 
AKaholic #: 188205
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wormraper View Post
I wonder if the newer n-paps and df,s come with the rak-1 like the newer wasr

Yep they come with rak-1 triggers for over a year now. The rak hammer profile is very gentle to the carrier tail. Absolutely no deformation on my DF carrier tail. Just some polish marks from the hammer.
Made in Austria is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 07:57 PM   #95
mishaco
Veteran Member
 
AKaholic #: 190226
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,003
Default

Well, my opinion has already been stated enough. Question though, in Rob's second 5k test, was that NPAP one of the original 2 rivet, or one of the newer 3 rivet models?

Neither of my NP-DF have ever given me a lick of trouble or cause to worry. Those friends of mine that own a standard NPAP report much the same.
There are several youtube (and other) reviews with positive conclusions, from satisfied NPAP owners (though to be fair, the same can be said for the RAS47).
While I do not have any NPAPs in the store ATM, I have sold a couple hundred over the years. Not once as a customer called ack telling me I sold them a POS and asking for return/warranty help. Not saying all that left my hands are still working perfectly today, but can say I don't know otherwise. Also for any of those out tehre in customer service and/or retail, I think you know how we tend to hear anytime someone isn't happy with a product...even if its 6 months or a year later lol. I had one guy call me after owning a Colt AR15 A4 from me. He wanted to return it after discovering the front sight base was canted slightly. It took him the same amount of time it would have his wife to bring a baby to term to notice this, but he still called me twice asking for a refund or return lol.

Finally, those that own NPAPs on this very board are generally reporting good reliability and no serious wear/tear.

So those things, up against Rob's 5k tests...and keeping in mind the second rifle was still shooting at the end.
Remember too that the paint on his Arsenal was bubbling, so does that mean that all Arsenals we own will do the same?

As to the 40-50 malfunctions, those could very well be caused by the rifle, and that possibly due to a too weak recoil spring.
There could also be another reason/cause. Might have been a bad mag in the mix he was using or just one that the NPAP didn't work 100% with.
Or it could have been the ammo. Recently, we posted a video of a Polytech Legend failing. In its comments, many people blame the Wolf ammo we were using, saying they experienced something similar in one of their rifles. This cold be. Yes, that Wolf has worked fine in our other guns, but its possible that due to a slightly tight chamber in the rifle, and slightly oversized casings; that we have tolarence stacking to produce the malfunctions. Is it possible something similar was happening there with that NPAP?
Also, just because we had a bad run with 1 Polytech, does that mean all of them are bad?

Of course not, a sample of 1 is prone to aborations and frankly just weird malfunctions. Yes, Rob did test 2 NPAPs and while his results were better with the second, he still had issues. Thing is, very few other people are reporting major issues with their semi-auto only NPAPs. Again, the BF Las Vegas guns? too many unknowns there for us really to make any informed conclusions. We don't know round counts, # of rounds in semi vs full, and how many rifles were converted and from which production batch/batches.

Final, reminder: all just my opinion. If you disagree, that's cool with me. Just as I don't at all mind you disagreeing with me.
All I can do is form my opinions based on as much first hand experience as possible, and I've just never had a bad experience with an NPAP that might change my mind. If i ever do, you all will hear about it asap.

Rob's videos are great, but I have never bought or passed up a firearm based solely on what one of his 5k tests has shown me.
However, it was thanks to his results (combined with a few others), that caused me to swap springs out in my Zastava PAPs, for which I am greatful. I do feel this is a simple fix, that will keep my guns in good working order for a longer period of time.
I did something similar with my WASR, replacing the Tapco FCG with something that wouldn't beatup my carrier.
And put the birdcage flash hider on my SAM7SF, because it looked a little gay with an AK74 brake on it hehe.

I don't mind modifying my own guns a bit to get them to where they appeal to me a little better.
I'd say with the NPAP, you do need to swap out a couple parts to allow it to be all the rifle it can be.

Buy or don't buy, its all good and we can still be friends right? hehe, cheers.

P.S. - just published a new video today and it does cover 2 Zastava products.
mishaco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2017, 05:23 AM   #96
MOTOROLANUT
Curio & Relic
 
AKaholic #: 187095
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Out in left field of the US of A
Posts: 2,086
Default

^^Well Stated^^
MOTOROLANUT is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2017, 09:11 AM   #97
manki77
New Member
 
AKaholic #: 192119
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Georgia
Posts: 21
Default

thanks for all the input everyone
manki77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2017, 10:50 PM   #98
acreativeusername
New Member
 
AKaholic #: 192251
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1
Default

Have the heat treating issues been resolved on these yet? I want a folder and a NPAP DF would save some hassle from getting a wasr and sourcing a side folder. Also curious about this recoil spring business, has anyone compared a regular wasr recoil spring to npap to see if it's a weak spring or over gassing?
acreativeusername is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2017, 12:00 AM   #99
mishaco
Veteran Member
 
AKaholic #: 190226
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,003
Default

Understand: NPAP M70 (fixed stock, 1.0mm), OPAP M70 (fixed stock 1.5mm), and NPAP-DF (folding stock, 1.0mm) are all Zastava built guns, but are different model variants.

Century and Zastava never acknoweldged any heat treat issue.

It was never 100% confirmed either. The evidence was interesting but people disagreed. Some said 'too hard' others 'too soft' and others 'too just right.' So it was a weird, fucked up gun version of Goldy Locks or something.
I think people have just let it rest. I've not seen any new studies or tests done within the last year or so.
there are 10s of thousands of PAPs out in the USA. I think if there was a major issue, we'd be seeing KBs on youtube by now...which we do see for the RAS47 and I.O.
I do think there are some PAP lemons, which sucks. Also lemons are true for any product, anywhere.
I think the NPAP is generally good to go. I think the NPAP-DF is generally very good to go. Its different trunnion style and 3 rivet locations seems to be plenty strong and durable. I am not aware of anyone reporting heat treat issues or cracked whatevers with the DF variant; just with the NPAP M70, and those are a few reports. Most youtube reviews show people that are happy with their purchase.

As to recoil springs, why get all scientific and waste time and energy doing testing? Its a $5 part and takes 2 minutes to replace. Its just insurance that myself and many others have taken with our rifles. Over gassed or not, why not? hurts nothing, costs next to nothing, and makes us feel better. I can tell you, mmy OPAP and NPDF do seem to have a bit less felt recoil after swapping their Zastava factory springs out with others (one has a Polish and the other a Wolf).


If you are planning to convert your rifle to full-auto and run 20,000 rds through it, then yeah probably just play it safe and avoid the Zastavas.
If you plan on shooting in semi auto and putting 1,000-2,000 rds through it a year, the PAPs are great values for the money, in my opinion.

I've tried putting 'I think' and 'my opinion' as that's all this is. I have no hardcore, scientific evidence to back what I feel up.
Likewise, those that dislike the PAPs do not have firm and regerously tested numbers to proove their case either.

Either of us could be right or wrong.

In the end, does this all really matter? Anyone can make a lemon, and sometimes even a cheap firearm lasts for ages. Heck, I bet there are plenty of happy HI-Point owners (my fingers feel dirty from typing that) with high-round count guns.
Nothing in life is certain, so just buy what you like and I bet you it all turns out just jim dandy.

Between myself and my circle of close gun friends, there are probably a dozen Zastava PAPs that we shoot regularly, and of those half are NPAPs.
So far, so good without issue, and this includes my friend who bought his back in 2013 right when they came out.

But to be fair, there are also happy RAS47 owners who are reporting 1,000s of rounds without issue.

I like imports, so when i see one i like, i grab it if i can.
mishaco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2017, 08:24 AM   #100
Maxxsmart
Member
 
Maxxsmart's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 193820
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mishaco View Post
Understand: NPAP M70 (fixed stock, 1.0mm), OPAP M70 (fixed stock 1.5mm), and NPAP-DF (folding stock, 1.0mm) are all Zastava built guns, but are different model variants.

Century and Zastava never acknoweldged any heat treat issue.

It was never 100% confirmed either. The evidence was interesting but people disagreed. Some said 'too hard' others 'too soft' and others 'too just right.' So it was a weird, fucked up gun version of Goldy Locks or something.
I think people have just let it rest. I've not seen any new studies or tests done within the last year or so.
there are 10s of thousands of PAPs out in the USA. I think if there was a major issue, we'd be seeing KBs on youtube by now...which we do see for the RAS47 and I.O.
I do think there are some PAP lemons, which sucks. Also lemons are true for any product, anywhere.
I think the NPAP is generally good to go. I think the NPAP-DF is generally very good to go. Its different trunnion style and 3 rivet locations seems to be plenty strong and durable. I am not aware of anyone reporting heat treat issues or cracked whatevers with the DF variant; just with the NPAP M70, and those are a few reports. Most youtube reviews show people that are happy with their purchase.

As to recoil springs, why get all scientific and waste time and energy doing testing? Its a $5 part and takes 2 minutes to replace. Its just insurance that myself and many others have taken with our rifles. Over gassed or not, why not? hurts nothing, costs next to nothing, and makes us feel better. I can tell you, mmy OPAP and NPDF do seem to have a bit less felt recoil after swapping their Zastava factory springs out with others (one has a Polish and the other a Wolf).


If you are planning to convert your rifle to full-auto and run 20,000 rds through it, then yeah probably just play it safe and avoid the Zastavas.
If you plan on shooting in semi auto and putting 1,000-2,000 rds through it a year, the PAPs are great values for the money, in my opinion.

I've tried putting 'I think' and 'my opinion' as that's all this is. I have no hardcore, scientific evidence to back what I feel up.
Likewise, those that dislike the PAPs do not have firm and regerously tested numbers to proove their case either.

Either of us could be right or wrong.

In the end, does this all really matter? Anyone can make a lemon, and sometimes even a cheap firearm lasts for ages. Heck, I bet there are plenty of happy HI-Point owners (my fingers feel dirty from typing that) with high-round count guns.
Nothing in life is certain, so just buy what you like and I bet you it all turns out just jim dandy.

Between myself and my circle of close gun friends, there are probably a dozen Zastava PAPs that we shoot regularly, and of those half are NPAPs.
So far, so good without issue, and this includes my friend who bought his back in 2013 right when they came out.

But to be fair, there are also happy RAS47 owners who are reporting 1,000s of rounds without issue.

I like imports, so when i see one i like, i grab it if i can.

Thanks again for adding some clear, concise thoughts, Misha.

One question... Did you use a standard Wolff spring, or the XP? I have a DF inbound now, and I'm on the fence about which spring to purchase.

Last edited by Maxxsmart; 10-29-2017 at 09:28 AM.
Maxxsmart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2017, 09:20 AM   #101
Zemlyak
Veteran Member
 
AKaholic #: 183159
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North East
Posts: 1,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mishaco View Post
I disagree. The NPAP did not fail Rob's 2nd 5k test, and the only part that really broke was the buttstock, which is a crap made US part from Century. They put the same stock on their current WASR10s too, so its reasonable to assume it would fail in a WASR 5k test too.


Not saying the NPAP is perfect, but at current prices, you get a very good rifle for the coin.
My NP-DF has been 100% for over a year now....hey for me personally, it has a better trackrecord than my Polytech Legend lol.
Only thing I recommend is to swap out the recoil spring, and eventually the buttstock (if fixed stock) too.
Then your rifle should be gtg.

At least, sure beats a RAS47 right?
And is much cheaper than any Arsenal, even the SLR-107R.

Some people ^ just prefer to advocate any AK manufacturer who is making bad products or providing horrible business style and no warranty and support to us. It is not easy to make/save $ for Americans as well Misha. Yes we respect your knowledge Misha but world around us is not as perfect and we would like to know either it is good or bad rifle, not a little bad or little good. That is too liberal for many of us.
__________________
Кто в армии служил, тот в цирке не смеется

Last edited by Zemlyak; 10-29-2017 at 09:37 AM.
Zemlyak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2017, 10:38 PM   #102
insider
Curio & Relic
 
insider's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 2882
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Red Sky Florida
Posts: 5,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Made in Austria View Post
That the carrier hits the rear trunnion is normal. The question is how hard. On my NPAP it was very hard with stock recoil spring. It got much softer with a new Wolff spring.
The carrier is not supposed to strike the rear trunnion, if it does, you have a weak recoil spring!
__________________
my AK never lets me down!
insider is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 01:33 PM   #103
insider
Curio & Relic
 
insider's Avatar
 
AKaholic #: 2882
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Red Sky Florida
Posts: 5,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. View Post
Here are the things that I have changed in my Npap.

1. Wolff extra power recoil spring
2. Replaced Tapco hammer to one from Arsenal (Bulgaria)
3. Shepherds hook replaced with a plate
Here's my take-

1. Replaced leaf spring assy with telescoping rod assy
2. Kept stock hammer
3. Shepherds hook replaced with a plate

PS- I have the 3 rivet rear trunnion.


__________________
my AK never lets me down!
insider is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 07:15 PM   #104
madrobot
Member
 
AKaholic #: 177479
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NH
Posts: 142
Default

I remember in the 80’s&90’s when everyone thought the Chinese AK’s were made of soft metal.
I love my DF and M92’s, zero problems for me.
__________________
Vepr VM-39
Arsenal SGL31
Arsenal. SLR 107FR
Yugo Npap DF
madrobot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 08:41 PM   #105
Art Vandaley
Senior Member
 
AKaholic #: 191257
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Tulare County, CA
Posts: 660
Default

Can you really compare the OPAPís and NPAPís? The Oís were surplus Guns from the 1970ís, right? The Nís are new production? My understanding (which could definitely be incorrect) was that the theory was the OPAPís had outstanding metal treatments back in the 1970ís when Zastava supposedly had their shit together....then the NPAP metal treatments were modern steps in the wrong direction?

I canít spesk to the Nís. I own a dinosaur OPAP and love the big tank!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mishaco View Post
It was still working at the end of the test.
Which is more than others.
Rob did give it away to a viewer too, recommending they keep an eye on the rear trunnion area.

The crack was very small, and 'might' have never happened with a different recoil spring.
The spring loaded latch coming out isn't a failure since the part effectively does nothing. It is just left over from grenade launching funtimes. The rifle would work exactly the same without it. Rob reinstalled it with a rock if memory serves right?
As to multiple cycling failures, i recall a few but nothing catastrophic, and causes could have been a number of things.

This site seems in love with the OPAP, yet people continue to disregard the NPAP. I am sorry, but that is a double standard.
Remember people loved the NPAP a lot more before his first 5k test. I just feel that if you condemn one, you must at least question the other. I know people think the OPAP's 1.5mm receiver would keep it from having any cracks or other issues, but this is just a theory. It could absolutely be true or a 5k test could reveal the same shortcomings. Without one, we just don't know for sure.

Keep in mind I did say the NPAP wasn't perfect and have agreed that the recoil spring is a weak point that needs switching out.
I am not even defending a rifle because I own it...I don't have an NPAP M70, either personally or in the store.
I do ahve an OPAP and NP-DF, which are different models, though all 3 are very similar and all built from the same basic materials and at the same factory by the same workers.

At $600 and even $550, the NPAP is still a much better buy than the I.O. or RAS47....you'll never convince me otherwise.
Is it better than the WASR? nah not really but then again, i don't think its majorily worse. Afterall, some guys like that the NPAP has a blued finish, and some have reported better accuracy with them. Also has a heavier barrel and longer HGs, which again some folks like.

There aren't reports all over the net of NPAPs blowing up like there are of the RAS47, so when people ask for a good sub-$600 AK, I don't feel at all bad in pointing them towards the NPAP.
It'll serve them a lot longer than most US made AKs, and it won't become a health risk hehe.

This is all old news and has been said before, so sorry for repeating myself.
Just my opinion based on selling these for a few years and talking with customers and friends that have shot theirs a goodly bit.
__________________
VEPR FM74, OPAP, WASR10, Bulg 74, Hungarian47, Saiga .223
Art Vandaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2017 The AK FIles